A tiny, outspoken, vocal minority has been forcing MPs to accept its unrepresentative opinions.
I refer, of course, to the commentariat in Westminster.
Certain media pundits display a glorious lack of self-awareness when they dismiss as unrepresentative those who refuse to tag along with Westminster group-think. Pesky party members and insurgent backbenchers might hold views that aren't mainstream at editorial conference meetings. But there are - still - hundreds of thousands more party members than there are newspaper columnists. Most MPs - particularly those from marginal seats - have to engage with swing voters every week.
Perhaps it is the pundits who are out of touch the the rest of the country?
Here are several examples where Westminster's aristocracy of opinion-formers have turned out to be stonkingly, and embarrassingly, wrong:
In my book, the End of Politics and the Birth of iDemocracy, I suggest that the internet will democratise opinion forming. With blogs and twitter, we will no longer be so beholden to the prejudices and preconceptions of a few columnists.
We are starting to see elite opinion formers overthrown. The sooner, the better.
blog comments powered by Disqus"A revolutionary text ... right up there with the Communist manifesto" - Dominic Lawson, Sunday Times
Printed and promoted by Chris Lowe on behalf of Douglas Carswell, both of 105 Station Road, Clacton-on-Sea, Essex