That’s true! I live in a city where gas is pricier. The 2.7 might be a smarter choice for me in the long run.
Fuel efficiency is important, but don’t forget about performance. The 3.5 EcoBoost can deliver more horsepower, which could be a deciding factor if you tow or haul often.
That’s true! I love the torque of the 3.5 for off-road adventures. But for daily commuting, the 2.7 might be a more economical choice. It’s all about how you plan to use your truck.
Performance is important, but does that justify the fuel costs? What’s the point if it’s going to break the bank every fill-up?
I think both engines have their pros and cons. Maybe consider your driving patterns. For city driving, the 2.7 might be superior, but for highway speeds, the 3.5 could be worth it.
7 Likes
LOL! Just think: with the 3.5, you get more horsepower—and more stops at the gas station! It’s like choosing between a sports car and a sensible sedan.
Hilarious analogy! But in all seriousness, you should calculate your anticipated gas costs. It can help clarify which to pick.
Long-term, the 2.7 could save you more. However, if you enjoy driving and need power, maybe the extra cost isn’t too much to bear. It can be quite the choice!
Exactly! It’s an investment in what your lifestyle needs are. You won’t regret choosing the engine that suits your habits best.
I can’t help but reflect: Sometimes we focus too much on efficiency and forget to enjoy the ride! No matter which engine, make sure it fits your adventure style.
8 Likes
I’m in the same boat! I’m torn between the 3.5L and the 2.7L EcoBoost. I’ve heard good things about the reliability of the 3.5L, but I wonder about the 2.7L’s maintenance costs. Anyone with long-term ownership experience?
I’ve had the 2.7L for a few years and I can vouch for its lower maintenance costs compared to the 3.5L. However, it does have its quirks, especially with turbo issues.
7 Likes
I’ve owned both! The 3.5L is a beast in terms of power, but it does require more frequent maintenance. I found the 2.7L to be surprisingly reliable, but it doesn’t have the same torque levels.
That’s true! I think it’s great for towing and heavier loads. But if you’re just commuting, the 2.7L might be a better fit for daily use.
From what I’ve read, the 3.5L can have some issues with timing chains around the 100,000 mile mark. The 2.7L seemed to have fewer reports of major issues but make sure to stay on top of the oil changes!
I’m leaning towards the 2.7L, but I’m worried about the turbo. How often do people really have issues with it? I’d love to hear more owner experiences!
Honestly, I had a turbo failure at 80k miles with my 2.7L, but it was covered under warranty. It’s a bit of a gamble with either engine, really.
I would recommend the 3.5L if you’re looking for longevity. I’ve seen many folks cross that 200k mile threshold with minimal issues, while the 2.7L seems to experience more variability in performance over time.
Wow, that sounds promising! I’ve been looking at 3.5L for towing, so that really helps. But isn’t maintenance on it pricier?
4 Likes
Don’t let the cost deter you too much. Good maintenance can extend the lifespan significantly. Plus, the driving experience with the 3.5L is just exhilarating!
6 Likes